Blogging the competitive difference

The competitive difference that blogging allows isn’t so much the content on its own but also the context in which it’s being said. A conversation on a blog simply allows for a greater degree of freedom, which in turn changes the quality of the information communicated. The nature of the exchange is thus different. For example if I talk to a colleague at work about England’s performance in the World Cup, it is set in a different than such discussion on my blog.

Similarly business blogging in stimulating exchanges with customers needs to recognise that the limitations on the interaction. The corporate inclination is to set the parameters of what is allowed much narrower than a customer or set of customers might want to. The point being simply that it pays to think in advance how wide an acceptable discussion parameter is set from the outset; as the wider the better – the greater the latitude the greater the chance to find out what the customer is really thinking about. Though of course it has to be balanced with internal company cultural constraints. But there also lies the catalytic power of blogging. If applied properly it can help change the business to make it more customer-centric and stimulate the destruction of old knowledge; it is a two-way dialogue which is closer to the customer’s reality, moving it on from a fancy marketing tool, to a means of being able to benefit from ‘uncertainty’.

How a Child Becomes a Scientist

Just reading the intriguing book ‘When We Were Kids; How a Child Becomes a Scientist’ by John Brockman which has inspired to think off any clues in my own childhood to such later (albeit amateur) pursuits. I can’t really think of any though since historian David Cannadine once said I had a ‘profound mind’, maybe I should sleep on it before my ego gets the better of me? (My abiding memory of him is sitting there in tutorials while he paced around the room rolling his eyes as he thought deep thoughts). Perhaps my interest in the science of coincidence is a legacy from childhood, though it’s far from unique? Certainly I recall playing with fire engines outside our home in Danbury, Essex, while firefighters were attending to an oven fire inside, and making a note of the coincidence. But one of the features of coincidences is how they stick in our mind, so nothing there either! So I guess this means (1) I’m not a scientist (2) Profound mind? On the available evidence it appears David Cannadine was talking about himself as I can’t see no Wikipedia entry for myself! So I guess the next best thing is my Christ’s College matriculation pic from 1984 (see Photos for the full blown version):